The OnlyFans dashboard was not built to run a business on.

It shows you a number. It does not show you which fans actually buy, what they paid last time, which month a refund belongs to, or whether today’s figure will still say the same thing tomorrow. Those are not exotic questions. They are the ordinary questions any other business answers before breakfast.

FanOptik is the accounting and analytics layer over your own account. Flat monthly, never a percentage of what you earn, and every figure checkable against the page OnlyFans actually pays you from.

Start freeTake-home calculator

Flat monthly
$29 or $49

Never a percentage of your income, and never a tier that rises because you had a good month.

Share of your earnings taken
0%

We are software. We never touch your content, never message your fans, and never take a cut.

Notice required to leave
None

Full export of every record, any time, with no conversation attached to it.

The least interesting table on this site.

Everything else here rests on this one thing, so it goes first. Pick any date range. Put our figures next to your own Statements page — the page the money actually arrives from — in the same three buckets OnlyFans itself uses. They match, or it is a bug we want to hear about.

BucketYour Statements pageFanOptik
Subscriptions$4,120.00$4,120.00
Tips$2,380.00$2,380.00
Messages$8,220.00$8,220.00
Net for the month$14,720.00$14,720.00
Difference$0.00

A tool that estimates from the activity feed cannot produce this table, because the feed and the statement are different records that disagree in ordinary ways — timing, refunds, currency rounding. Reconciling means resolving those disagreements rather than picking the friendlier number, and it is the only reason anything further down this page is worth reading. Every figure also carries a grade saying whether it was read from a statement, read from the ledger, or derived, so you always know which kind of number you are looking at.

Four things the dashboard will not tell you.

Not because it is bad software. Because it is a platform view of an account, and you are running a business that happens to live on it.

Today’s number is not final
The dashboard shows partial days that quietly change as statements settle, so you end up screenshotting figures that will not match tomorrow. FanOptik counts completed days only. A number does not move after you have seen it, which is the whole reason it is safe to make a decision on.
completed days
You cannot see who actually spends
A follower count is not a business. What matters is which fans buy, at what price, how often, and who has gone quiet — and that needs per-fan transaction history rather than a feed. Spend is summed from real purchases and never scaled to force a total to look right.
per fan
Refunds disappear without a trace
When money is clawed back it simply leaves your totals, usually in a different month from the sale. FanOptik infers the reversal from the gap between the transaction feed and the statement, matches it to the original purchase, and books it back to the month the sale happened.
restated
Pricing is guesswork
Was $15 right for that send? The only honest answer comes from what your own fans paid before, at each price point, with the sample size next to it — not from what worked for somebody else’s audience last spring.
price ladder

What you get, and what each one actually computes.

Six instruments. Where a figure is a guess it says so on the figure, and where there is not enough history to answer, it says that instead of filling the gap in.

Statement SyncEarnings pulled through a licensed data provider and reconciled against your Statements page line for line, in the same three buckets the platform uses. This is the table above, run every day.
Fan records with real spending historyWhat each fan bought, when, and at what price, computed from actual transactions rather than extrapolated. Cohorts group them by the month they arrived, so you can see whether a good intake month is still good.
The price ladderWhat your fans actually paid at each price point, with conversion and sample size on every cell. Bands with too little behind them are marked thin rather than filled in, and it never changes a price by itself. Solo Pro.
Earnings pacingMonth to date plus the last fourteen completed days’ daily rate multiplied by the days remaining. One multiplication, labelled as the projection it is, with no smoothing and no confidence interval invented on top of it. Solo Pro.
Assisted drafting, with you as the authorThree hundred drafts a month on Solo. A draft is a starting point you edit and send. Nothing is ever sent for you, and no message content is stored or used to train anything.
Suspected reversal detectionChargebacks and refunds inferred by comparing the transaction feed against the statements, matched to the original purchase, and labelled with how confident that match is.
No bot ever speaks as you

A permanent design decision rather than a feature we have not got to yet.

Every message that leaves an account through FanOptik was written or approved by a person, under their own named login. We do not build autonomous fan-facing messaging, and we are not going to, for three reasons that all point the same way: fans are increasingly able to tell, the platform’s rules keep tightening around impersonation, and a putative class action filed in July 2024 in the Central District of California concerns paid chatter messaging on OnlyFans. A named human behind every send with a full audit trail is the design response to that.

There is a commercial version of the same argument. The thing your income runs on is fans who believe they are talking to you. That is the asset, and it is not worth trading for a faster reply time.

No autonomous fan-facing messaging, ever
Drafts are assistance; you edit and you send
Message content is never stored or used for training
Anything sent traces to a named person

Working with an agency, or thinking about it.

The biggest risk in an agency relationship is not the commission percentage. It is not being able to check the numbers the percentage is applied to. Those are different problems and only one of them is fixable by negotiating harder.

If your agency runs FanOptik

You get your own view, logged in as yourself: earnings reconciled against the same Statements page you can open, and the commission arithmetic in the open. Changes made after a period is locked are appended with a date rather than overwriting what you already saw, so a figure you read in March still says the same thing in June.

If you are evaluating one

Three questions, and any agency that answers all three plainly is ahead of most of this industry. What percentage, and is it taken on gross or on net after the platform fee? Can I see per-fan records rather than only totals? What exactly do I take with me if I leave?

Know your own numbers first

The same rate on gross and on net are not the same deal — on a $18,400 month, thirty per cent of gross is $5,520 and thirty per cent of net is $4,416. The free take-home calculator does that arithmetic in two minutes, with no email gate, before you sign anything.

One thing worth saying plainly because most tools in this market will not: we sell to agencies as well as to creators, and that is a real conflict of interest for a page like this one. The way we handle it is that the creator view is the same reconciled ledger the agency owner reads, filtered to your account — not a separate, friendlier calculation built for you. If those two ever disagreed, the product would be worthless to both of you.

You can check it, you can take it, you can delete it.

What you can always do
  • Export everything, any timeTransactions with all three money figures, fan history, the lot. Cancel and it comes with you. Your fan relationships are an asset you own rather than a hostage.
  • Check any figure against the platformAny date range, next to your own Statements page. If it does not tie, that is a bug and we want to hear about it.
  • See the grade on every numberRead from a statement, read from the ledger, or derived. You always know which kind you are looking at.
What is deliberately not held
  • What your fans wroteThe record holds that messages happened and how many, never their content. There are also no free-text note fields about fans as people, by design.
  • Detailed records foreverPurchase detail is kept for 24 months, then collapsed into monthly totals with no personal identifier attached.
  • Anything a fan has asked us to eraseFans can request their data or their erasure and the answer is a real implemented feature. The full policy is public on the fan data page, written so you can publish it under your own name.

Less stored means less to leak, less to subpoena and less to misuse. It also costs us analytical power — there are questions about your audience we simply cannot answer because answering them would mean keeping what people said. That trade is deliberate and it is not up for negotiation on a bigger plan.

How your account is kept safe: a mechanism, not a vibe.

Here is the architecture, including the part that is not reassuring. The riskiest thing any tool can do to your account is operate it, so the default is not to.

Read-only, through a licensed providerYour numbers arrive through a licensed data pipeline at one to two paced pulls a day. FanOptik never holds your OnlyFans password and never scrapes, and any challenge from the platform is a hard stop rather than something to retry through.
No disguiseWe do not build or sell anti-detect browsers or fingerprint spoofing. That is a statement about what we do: we would rather keep the footprint small enough to explain than make a larger one harder to see.
Three separate stops, with three scopesA per-creator pause that no route can get around, including a live session. An account-wide switch that turns messaging off across the board, which stops scheduled posts too. And a breaker that trips on its own when the platform pushes back repeatedly.
Everything that goes out is screenedOn creation and again at the moment of publishing, by the same screen every message passes. Attempts to move a fan to an off-platform payment rail are refused rather than logged and allowed.
Nothing lands on anybody’s machineWhere a session is needed it runs server side. Credentials are used once to establish a connection and then discarded, never stored and never logged.
The honest partNothing that touches this platform is zero risk, and anyone telling you otherwise is selling. Third-party tooling sits outside the platform’s terms. What we control is the size of the footprint and how fast it can be stopped.

Every external claim on this site — the litigation, the platform’s own terms, the competitor price lists — is on the references page with a link and a date. If a claim on this page is not there, it is a claim about our own product, and the pilot exists so you can check those yourself.

Two plans. Both flat. Pick by how deep you want the analytics.

Neither one moves when you have a good month, and there is no tier above these for a creator running their own account.

Solo — $29 a month

Or $290 a year, two months free. One connected account, self-managed.

Statement Sync, reconciled earnings
Fan records with real spending history
Pay-per-view price suggestions
300 assisted drafts a month
Full export, any time
Solo Pro — $49 a month

Or $490 a year, two months free. Everything in Solo, plus the operator analytics.

Earnings pacing for your account
Fan cohorts: new, heating up, going quiet
The full price ladder, with sample sizes
A larger drafting allowance
Everything in Solo

Managing two or more accounts, or bringing somebody on to chat? That is an agency plan, and the line is drawn there rather than at an earnings threshold — which is the only reason Solo can stay at $29 for the people it was drawn for. The full price list is published, including the agency bands.

Asked before, answered straight.

Do you take a percentage of my earnings?

No. $29 or $49 a month, flat, and your best month costs the same as your worst. All three of the competitor price lists we track — Infloww, OnlyMonster and CreatorHero — are set by what a creator earns instead; both approaches are on the references page with links and dates, so you can compare them yourself rather than take our word for which is better for you.

Is FanOptik an agency?

No. FanOptik is software. We never touch your content, never message your fans and never take a cut. If you work with an agency, this can be the neutral layer you can both check — and we sell to agencies too, which is exactly why the creator view has to be the same ledger rather than a separate one.

Will AI message my fans?

Never. Assisted drafting gives you a starting point that you edit and send. Nothing goes out without a person behind it, and message content is never stored or used for training. This is a permanent design decision rather than a current limitation, because autonomous fan-facing messaging would also break the attribution that payroll depends on for anybody running a team.

How do you get my numbers without my password?

Through a licensed data provider that connects with your authorisation, read-only. FanOptik never holds your password and never operates your account. Where a session is needed at all it runs server side, and credentials are used once to establish it and then discarded.

What happens to my data if I cancel?

You export everything first: the full transaction ledger, fan history, all of it. Detailed records then follow the same retention policy as always, and erasure requests are honoured. There is no exit fee and no held-hostage fan list.

What if I join an agency later?

Your history comes with you. If the agency runs FanOptik you keep your own view of the same reconciled numbers they see, which is a materially better position than trusting a monthly screenshot — particularly for the question of whether the commission was taken on gross or on net.

Why should I trust the numbers?

Because you can check them without trusting us. Pick any date range and compare against your own Statements page; they tie exactly, line for line, which is the table at the top of this page. Every figure also carries a grade showing whether it was read from a statement, read from the ledger, or derived.

What can it not do?

It cannot show you anything from before you connected — the record starts when you start. It cannot tell you what your fans said, because that is never stored. It will not price a genuinely new kind of content, because the ladder only describes what has already happened. And it does not make you money; it tells you where the money already came from.

Where to look next.

Take-home calculatorFree: gross to take-home, including whether an agency cut lands on gross or on net.Open
Asking about your splitThe four questions worth asking an agency, and the one line that answers each.Read
How fan data is handledWritten so you can publish it under your own name, to your own audience.Read
MethodologyEvery rule that decides a number, including the ones that are not in your favour.Read

Fourteen days with your real account. Then you decide.

No card, no contract, and no demo workspace full of invented data. Connect, watch the numbers reconcile against your own Statements page, and keep the export either way.

Start freeSee pricing

FanOptik

Analytics and chatting for OnlyFans agencies and independent creators. Measured across the whole roster, with every figure graded by where it came from.

© 2026 FanOptik. All rights reserved. · Built for agencies that would rather measure the roster than estimate it.