Run the agency on numbers OnlyFans never works out for you.

Analytics computed across your whole roster rather than one account at a time: which fans pay more than one of your creators, which signup months are still renewing, what each price band actually returns per send, and where the month closes. Then the console your team works in — one merged inbox across the roster, campaigns, scheduled sends and the vault.

Every figure graded by where it came from. One flat published price for all of it. You will not find an invented revenue-lift percentage anywhere on this page; you will find how each number is made.

Book a demoSee the full price list

Rehearsed at
70

Connected accounts, through the real pipeline, finishing inside the overnight window. A rehearsal, not seventy live accounts.

Published plans
$349–$2,999

Flat, by roster size. No revenue share, no per-seat fee, no call required to learn a price.

Stats without a source
0

Every external figure on this site traces to the references page, with a link and a date.

Six jobs. The first one is the reason the other five are worth doing.

In the order they earn their keep. Everything below the first two exists to make the first two trustworthy on the day somebody disagrees with them.

Analytics across the roster
The half a single account cannot do. Fan tiers graded on what somebody spends across every creator you run, signup-month cohorts with retention and lifetime value, month-end pacing and locked recurring revenue, whale concentration, revenue by weekday and hour, and revenue per send by price band.
roster analytics
The daily workspace
The merged inbox, campaigns, scheduled sends and content vault your chatters already expect, at full depth — with queues that fill themselves from the analytics above rather than from folders somebody remembers to tidy. Selling from one window across the whole roster is where the measurement gets acted on.
chatting
Money that ties out
Earnings reconciled against the platform’s own Statements page line for line, rather than estimated from the activity feed, with every figure graded by where it came from: statement, ledger, or derived. When a creator questions a number, you show the working.
payroll
Attribution nobody can move
Revenue is credited to the shift that covered the creator when the money landed, under a rule published before the money arrived. Nothing a chatter does afterwards can move a sale onto their own name, because the rule does not read the inbox at all.
shift console
Payroll computed, not exported
Hours plus commission on attributed sales, in locked pay periods the person being paid cannot edit. Not a report you then compute pay from in a spreadsheet, which is a different and much weaker thing.
payroll
Access without credentials
Chatters work through FanOptik under their own logins, with passkeys available. Creator credentials live server side and never reach a chatter’s machine. Thirty-two API paths refuse every seat but the owner, and off-shift sending is refused by the server rather than hidden by the interface.
four seats

The analytics, one by one, and what each actually computes.

Six instruments, each with the arithmetic stated. None of them is a score, a grade out of ten, or a confidence percentage — where a figure is a guess, it says so on the figure.

Month-end pacing, and the floor underneath itMonth to date plus the last fourteen completed days’ daily rate multiplied by the days remaining. One multiplication, printed. Beside it, locked recurring: the subscription payments from fans whose auto-renew is on today, which is contracted rather than projected.
Signup-month cohortsFans grouped by the month they first appeared, with how many are still active, the retention rate and average lifetime value, each plotted against the cohort’s true age. We do not draw a month-by-month survival curve, because we cannot observe one.
Cross-roster spend tiersOne tier definition for the whole product, graded on what a fan has spent across every creator you run rather than on the account you happen to be looking at. Whale from $1,000, Dolphin from $500, Minnow above zero, and Follower kept distinct from a small spender.
The price ladderWhat fans actually paid at each pay-per-view price point, per creator, with conversion and sample size next to every cell. Bands with too little behind them are reported as thin rather than filled in, and it never changes a price by itself.
Contact efficiencyRevenue against the fans a creator’s account actually exchanged messages with. Fans whose threads were never read are excluded from the denominator rather than counted as not-talked-to, and the figure ships with the share of the fan base it was computed from.
Roster benchmarksEach creator ranked against your own roster’s distribution across seven metrics, with the overall position being the mean of those percentiles. A transparent average against your agency, not a score against an industry we have no data for.

Two of these come with a constraint worth knowing before you rely on them. Contact efficiency is measured per creator and never per named chatter, because the platform exposes no chatter identity in a message — attributing it to a person would mean inferring from shift times and presenting the inference as a fact. And the benchmark compares a creator to your roster, so on a roster of four it is arithmetic rather than insight.

The Shift Console: accountability, not surveillance.

Counting activity tells you who looks busy. Attribution tells you which shift produced which money. This product is built on the second question, and the difference shows up in what it refuses to do as much as in what it computes.

Sales follow the schedule. Revenue is credited to the shift that covered the creator when the sale landed — not to whoever messaged last, and not to whoever claims it.
An overlap is a rota mistake, not an argument. If two shifts cover one creator at once the revenue is split evenly between them and flagged, so the scheduling error is visible in the split rather than quietly resolved in somebody’s favour.
The unattributed share is published. Revenue that landed when nobody was clocked in is reported as its own line. Your totals add up because nothing was spread across the team to make them look like they do.
Shift lock is enforced on the server. An off-shift chatter cannot send for a creator. Not a greyed-out button a refresh defeats: the check runs in the dispatcher, the one path a message takes to leave, so a crafted request is refused rather than merely discouraged. Owners are exempt, and an agency that runs an open floor rather than fixed shifts can switch the lock off.
Handover is a first-class record. What happened last shift, which fans are warm, what was promised — written in the product rather than in a side channel, and acknowledged at clock-in.
Attendance becomes money. Clock-ins run against the schedule, and no-shows and overruns land straight in the pay period, so reliability stops being an argument and becomes a number.
Automation is its own employee. When an automated message produces a sale the revenue is credited to Automation rather than to a person, so you can see what the humans earned and what would have arrived anyway.
Nothing reads what was said. The record holds that messages happened and how many, never their content, which is why no figure above can be produced by interpreting a conversation.

The overlap rule is the one people ask about. An earlier version let an owner nominate whoever was “really driving” a shared shift; it was removed because its only correct use was papering over a scheduling bug. The even split is deliberately the wrong answer to a situation that should not exist, which is what makes it show up.

The pay run stops being an argument.

Chatter pay disputes have already reached the California Labor Commissioner. The problem is always the same shape: the numbers behind the pay were editable, invisible, or both.

Commission applies to the chat-driven buckets, messages and tips. Subscriptions pass through untouched. Rates are set per agency, and the arithmetic is visible to the people it pays. Try it yourself with the free chatter pay calculator.

What locking a period actually means
1Pay is computed from attribution, not entered by hand. The inputs are clock-ins and credited sales, both of which existed before anybody ran payroll.
2The person being paid cannot edit the input. Neither can a team lead, who has no route to payroll at all.
3Closed periods are immutable. Changes after a lock are appended with a date and an author rather than overwriting what was there, so a corrected month still shows what it said at the time.
4The export is yours. Whatever actually pays your team — a bank, an accountant, a payroll system — gets a file. We never move the money.

Your creators can check you. That wins signings.

Recruiting now means answering for an industry where a 2026 BBC investigation documented allegations of managers controlling and misreporting creators’ earnings. The agencies that do well over the next few years will be the ones who can demonstrate they are not that, and a percentage discount does not demonstrate anything.

What a creator opens herself
  • Her earnings, tied to her own Statements pageReconciled against the page she can open in the next tab, on an account you have no access to.
  • The commission arithmetic, in the openThe rate on screen and the base it is applied to stated as its own line, rather than assumed.
  • Coverage, including the hours nobody workedNamed seats and shift times. A view that showed only the shifts that happened would be a brochure.
  • Her full export, if she ever leavesNo retention conversation attached to it.
What it costs you to offer it
  • Your rate becomes legibleIf it is high she can see exactly how high. There is no version of this that shows its working and also obscures the number.
  • You cannot quietly revise a past monthThe figure she read in March is the figure in June, including the months you would rather revisit.
  • It does not make the split fairOnly legible. What the split should be stays a commercial negotiation; this just makes sure you are both negotiating about the same figures.
  • It will not make an agency honestIt makes the numbers checkable, which is a smaller and more defensible claim.

The safety answer, including the part that is not reassuring.

This is our architecture rather than a promise about outcomes. The caveat at the end is part of the answer, not a disclaimer bolted onto it.

Read-only by defaultData arrives through a licensed provider, read-only, at one to two paced pulls per account per day with a hard stop on any account challenge. No creator password is ever held on a chatter’s machine.
No disguise, and no arms raceWe do not build or sell anti-detect browsers or fingerprint spoofing. That is a statement about what we do, and the reason is that the smallest footprint we can engineer is the one we can keep explaining as the platform’s rules move.
Guarded actions, when you actHuman pacing with jitter, gradual warm-up for new accounts, and probation mode, which halts an account the moment the platform pushes back rather than retrying into a problem.
A ledger that survives the questionEvery action a chatter took is in the audit trail with the money attributed to the right shift. When something needs explaining, the explanation already exists.
Live sessions treated as the risk they areOptional, off by default, and only with the creator’s signed authorisation. Sessions run server side with a dedicated connection per creator, and nothing lands on a chatter’s machine.
The honest caveatNothing that touches this platform is zero risk, and a vendor promising no chance of a ban is telling you what you want to hear. Third-party tooling sits outside the platform’s terms; we minimise the footprint and give you the controls to stop.

Why a person writes or approves every message, permanently: a putative class action filed in July 2024 in the Central District of California concerns paid chatter messaging on OnlyFans, and the design response is a named human behind every send with a full audit trail, rather than autonomous fan-facing automation. The docket, the platform’s own terms, and every other external claim on this site are on the references page with links and dates.

White label it, and wire it into what you already run.

Your brand on the platform

From the Agency plan up, FanOptik runs under your own name on your own subdomain. Your creators and your team see your agency rather than our logo. It is your brand on our software: not a rebuild, and not your own codebase.

An API that keeps the receipts

A scoped, key-authenticated read API plus webhooks for sync and alert events. Money figures carry their provenance grade, so anything you build downstream inherits the same defensibility as the dashboard.

Isolation as a feature

Each agency runs in its own database, with encrypted off-site backups that are restore-tested. Another tenant’s traffic, bugs or legal process cannot reach your data.

What breaks next, by size

The platform is the same at every size. What changes is which part you need first, and which argument arrives next.

Four things go wrong as a roster grows and they arrive in a fairly predictable order: paying somebody from a document you maintain, then managing through somebody else, then month end becoming a job, then everything becoming a contract conversation. Each one has a thing to put in place before it happens rather than after.

That is one page rather than four, read downwards, with the plan each band maps to and what it still will not do for you.

Read the roster-size ladder

Published, flat, and finished in one sentence.

Starter $349 for up to 10 creators. Growth $849 for up to 25. Pro $1,699 for up to 50. Agency $2,999 for up to 75, white label included. Enterprise past that. Unlimited seats on every plan, annual gets two months free, and your bill does not move when a creator has a record month.

Metered

3Connected creator accounts, live session hours, assisted drafts. Nothing else.

Team seats

∞Chatters, team leads and creator logins, on every plan.

Revenue share

0%Your best month costs exactly what your worst one costs.

See the full price listMore free math, no email gate

Fourteen days on your real roster, and the exit is always open.

The pilot is the proof

No demo workspace with invented data. Connect your accounts, run your real shifts, watch the numbers reconcile against the Statements page, and put our totals next to whatever you use today. Fourteen days, no card.

Onboarding is included

Roster and team onboarding on every plan, and dedicated onboarding on Agency and Enterprise, because a fifty creator migration deserves a sequence rather than a help doc.

Leaving is a feature

Full export of every record, any time, with no retention conversation attached. We would rather keep you with the product than with a hostage.

What agency owners ask first.

Is it safe? Will my accounts get banned?

The honest version is that nothing touching this platform is zero risk and we will not tell you otherwise. What we control is architecture: the default path is read-only through a licensed provider, paced and jittered, with no passwords on chatter machines. Anything that acts is warmed up, paced and sits under probation mode, which halts an account the moment the platform pushes back.

Do you take a cut of sales?

No. Flat monthly plans by roster size, published on the pricing page. No revenue share, no earnings tiers, no per-seat fees. All three of the competitor price lists we track — Infloww, OnlyMonster and CreatorHero — are set by what a creator earns; ours is set by how many creators you have, and both approaches are on the references page with links and dates.

How many seats do I get?

Unlimited, on every plan. Chatters, team leads and creator logins are all included. Staffing twenty-four hour coverage properly should not multiply your software bill, and metering seats would mean charging you for the thing that makes the record complete.

Where is the AI?

Serving your chatters, never impersonating your creators. Drafting assistance a human edits and sends, thread summaries at handover, and price suggestions with their evidence and sample size attached. No autonomous fan-facing AI, permanently: it would break the attribution your payroll depends on.

How is this different from a monitoring tool?

Monitoring counts activity. This attributes outcomes: which shift earned which revenue, computed into pay nobody can quietly edit. You still see hours and attendance, but as inputs to money rather than as a substitute for it. If what you want is a keystroke count, this is the wrong product and we would rather you knew that now.

We already run another CRM. How painful is switching?

It replaces rather than sits beside: the same inbox, sending and campaign workflow your team knows, plus the roster-wide analytics and the record layer underneath. Run both through the fourteen day pilot on the same accounts, compare the two sets of numbers, then consolidate. Onboarding is included and your export comes with you either way.

What proof do you have that this works?

The overnight sync is rehearsed at a seventy account roster through the real pipeline and inside its window. The money methodology is public, so you can put any date range next to the Statements page and check it. What we will not do is quote an unverifiable revenue-lift percentage — the pilot exists so the proof can be your own roster rather than somebody else’s testimonial.

Can a team lead see what people are paid?

No. Payroll, attribution and the coverage map all sit behind an owner-only wall that returns a refusal to every other seat, and the full list of thirty-two refused paths is printed on the seats page rather than described. A team lead cannot look up what a chatter earned, including their own.

Where to go next.

Roster analyticsThe six instruments above, in the product, with the grade on every figure.Open
By roster sizeWhat breaks next as you grow, and the one thing to set up before each break.Open
Four seatsThe owner-only wall in full, and the ten capabilities that can be granted or withheld.Open
The situationsThe specific conversations this exists for, each with the artefact that ends it.Read

Bring your real roster. Keep whichever numbers win.

A 20 minute walkthrough, then 14 days on your own accounts, no card. If our numbers do not earn their keep against what you use today, walk away with the export.

Book a demoSee the use cases

FanOptik

Analytics and chatting for OnlyFans agencies and independent creators. Measured across the whole roster, with every figure graded by where it came from.

© 2026 FanOptik. All rights reserved. · Built for agencies that would rather measure the roster than estimate it.